# tranny shop supplied it. you can get them online. google will provide the answer. :0 nm

Posted by Matt (93SE) on June 25, 2002 at 14:44:40:

In Reply to: hmm, that might be a good option, where did you get the luk? posted by «§» on June 25, 2002 at 13:46:08:

: : As for how it felt, I loved it. only drawback was the heavy pedal. made traffic a workout.

: : I'm not running the ACT anymore anyway. now using a LuK clutch after I blew up the tranny. tranny shop said I fried the ACT driving it home in 4th gear. the thing got REALLY hot and smoked once, but I've seen that happen on many a car and still be fine after it cools off.
: : so now I'm using a LuK clutch. the shop highly recommended it and SAID it would hold the power I'm looking to put into it.
: : the pedal is MUCH softer than the ACT, so I'm not sure about the holding power. specs for the LuK and ACT are the same though (367lb TQ or so).
: : so we'll see. it was also cheaper than the ACT by about $100.

Replys:

- Craig is lazy. He will never search if someone will give him the answer. nm Lordrandall (92se5 w/Ecotek) 15:13:22 6/25/2002 (1)
  - I would have, the network at work died all afternoon and I was home for a minute when I posted «§» (93 SE) 16:23:14 6/25/2002 (0)

Post a Reply:

Name: |
E-Mail |
Car: |
Subject |
Comments:
: : : As for how it felt, I loved it. only drawback was the heavy pedal. made traffic a workout. : : : I'm not running the ACT anymore anyway. now using a LuK clutch after I blew up the tranny. tranny shop said I fried the ACT driving it home in 4th gear. the thing got REALLY hot and smoked once, but I've seen that happen on many a car and still be fine after it cools off. : : : so now I'm using a LuK clutch. the shop highly recommended it and SAID it would hold the power I'm looking to put into it. : : : the pedal is MUCH softer than the ACT, so I'm not sure about the holding power. specs for the LuK and ACT are the same though (367lb TQ or so). : : : so we'll see. it was also cheaper than the ACT by about $100.