# Wreck? bent control arms? worn bushings? how far off is it? nm

Posted by Matt (93SE) on September 09, 2002 at 13:08:52:

In Reply to: Nice. I wonder why mine is so fubar'd with just the Eibachs n/m posted by Jeff92se on September 09, 2002 at 12:01:03:

: : They didn't align it because of my torn axle boot, but here's the specs they got off the car from when we re-assebled the suspension. Not too bad if you ask me...

: : Front:
: : Camber: L: -.70 R: -.50
: : Caster: L: +1.3 R: +1.00
: : Toe: L: +.04 R: +.04

: : Rear:
: : Camber: L: -.80 R: -.80
: : Toe: L: +.12 R: -.04

: : Definitely need some adjustments but it's not as crazy as I was expecting. With my rear toe settings, I should be able to make some pretty crazy LH turns.

: : -Jacob

Replys:

- No bad wrecks. Nothing is bent up front. Rears are like -0.9(not bad) but one of the fronts is -1.1(not horrendous but tire wear is noticable)-> Jeff92se (92se) 13:50:58 9/09/2002 (3)
  - I had it too, until I changed out the ball joints..since then, it's been cool. blackandwhite (93 VE 5spd) 12:26:08 9/13/2002 (0)
  - Mine are close to that also, but that's easy to fix. unbolt the two bolts on the spindle, yank that sumbitch out some, then bolt it back together. there's a degree of play in the bolts. nm Matt (93SE) 01:01:29 9/10/2002 (0)
  - I have the exact same issue, same suspension/tire setup as Jeff... Jonny (94se 5spd) 16:04:51 9/09/2002 (0)

Post a Reply:

Name: |
E-Mail |
Car: |
Subject |
Comments:
: : : They didn't align it because of my torn axle boot, but here's the specs they got off the car from when we re-assebled the suspension. Not too bad if you ask me... : : : Front: : : : Camber: L: -.70 R: -.50 : : : Caster: L: +1.3 R: +1.00 : : : Toe: L: +.04 R: +.04 : : : Rear: : : : Camber: L: -.80 R: -.80 : : : Toe: L: +.12 R: -.04 : : : Definitely need some adjustments but it's not as crazy as I was expecting. With my rear toe settings, I should be able to make some pretty crazy LH turns. : : : -Jacob